在LabVIEW和WinCC中,哪种组态液压系统的简单度更高?

10分钟前阅读2回复0
小小的人啊
小小的人啊
  • 管理员
  • 注册排名4
  • 经验值503490
  • 级别管理员
  • 主题100698
  • 回复0
楼主

1、句子结构

- 文章结构较为混乱,有些段落之间没有明显的过渡或逻辑联系。

- 句子长度不一致,有些长,有些短。

2、词汇使用

- 有些单词使用不当,如“虚拟仪器”、“通讯”等。

3、语法错误

- 有些句子存在拼写错误,如“LabVIEW”中的“V”应该改为“v”。

4、情感表达

- 文章缺乏正面的情感表达,更多的是客观陈述。

5、反问句使用

- 反问句虽然可以增加文章的深度和趣味性,但在文中并没有被合理运用。

修改后的版本

LabVIEW vs WinCC: Which Grouping Tool is Simpler?
Which groupification tool among LabVIEW and WinCC is simpler? Do you prefer WinCC or LabVIEW based on your lower-level machine type?
Firstly, LabVIEW is not a professional industrial grouping software but rather a graphical programming software (similar to VB). LabVIEW's strength lies in virtual instruments and signal processing. If you use LabVIEW for grouping, there may be many things that require manual coding (communications, data real-time collection and storage), which requires higher requirements.
WinCC is the professional industrial grouping software from Siemens. It supports well with Siemens' own lower-level machines (PLC, HMI, smart meters) and integrates some communication protocols and graphic elements. 
Besides, domestic groupification tools include GroupWise, Three-Dimensional Force Control; internationally renowned groupification tools include InTouch, iFix.
If the system is not complex and does not require high requirements, using domestic groupification tools will be simpler. However, regardless of the complexity of the system, you need to purchase authorization. If you can write code yourself, then don't need to.
LabVIEW vs WinCC: Which Grouping Tool is Simpler?
This depends on which tool you are more familiar with. If it is an empty LabVIEW project, I would recommend using WinCC. Therefore, you need to spend a long time setting up communication between PLCs and HMI, while WinCC only needs to establish connections and variables directly.
Of course, if you are not familiar with WinCC, are very familiar with LabVIEW, or just want to do display actions, you should consider whether you like LabVIEW better!
WinCC should be simpler, and it depends on your lower-level machine type. First, LabVIEW is not a professional industrial grouping software but rather a graphical programming software (similar to VB). LabVIEW's strength lies in virtual instruments and signal processing. If you use LabVIEW for grouping, there may be many things that require manual coding (communications, data real-time collection and storage), which requires higher requirements.
WinCC is the professional industrial grouping software from Siemens. It supports well with Siemens' own lower-level machines (PLC, HMI, smart meters) and integrates some communication protocols and graphic elements. Besides, domestic groupification tools include GroupWise, Three-Dimensional Force Control; internationally renowned groupification tools include InTouch, iFix.
If the system is not complex and does not require high requirements, using domestic groupification tools will be simpler. However, regardless of the complexity of the system, you need to purchase authorization. If you can write code yourself, then don't need to.

主要改进建议:

1、和副标题:添加一个明确的标题和副标题,使读者更容易理解文章的主题和重点。

2、合理的段落划分:将文本分成更小的段落,提高可读性和逻辑性。

3、正确的词汇选择:确保所有单词都正确无误。

4、清晰的语言表达:使用简洁明了的语言,避免过于冗长和复杂的句子。

5、适当的反问句:在适当的地方使用反问句来强调关键点,增强文章的情感张力。

0
回帖

在LabVIEW和WinCC中,哪种组态液压系统的简单度更高? 期待您的回复!

取消
载入表情清单……
载入颜色清单……
插入网络图片

取消确定

图片上传中
编辑器信息
提示信息